WORTHS

Compare reported wealth

Bookmarkable — the comparison lives in the URL.

  1. Michael Jordan$4.3B
  2. LeBron James$1.4B
  3. Tiger Woods$1.5B
  4. Cristiano Ronaldo$1.2B
  5. Serena Williams$400M
  6. Roger Federer$1.1B

Ratio of estimated net worth

Michael Jordan’s estimated net worth is approximately 11× Serena Williams’s.

Combined estimated wealth

$9.9B

Sum of estimated net worth. Individual figures may include jointly owned or overlapping assets.

Sourcing

11 originating reports

Across 6 profiles — repeats of the same figure are counted once.

Chart scale
Reported range (low–high)Estimated net worthWhy the estimated net worth isn’t necessarily the midpoint of the range
  1. Michael Jordan

    Former NBA player & businessman

    Higher confidence
    $4.3Brange $3.8B – $4.3Bapproximately 11× the group’s lowest estimated net worth

    Nike/Jordan Brand royalties · Charlotte Hornets sale proceeds

  2. LeBron James

    NBA player & businessman

    Moderate confidence
    $1.4Brange $850M – $1.4Bapproximately 3.5× the group’s lowest estimated net worth

    NBA career salary · Nike endorsement/equity deal

  3. Tiger Woods

    Professional golfer & businessman

    Higher confidence
    $1.5Brange $1.3B – $1.5Bapproximately 3.8× the group’s lowest estimated net worth

    Endorsements (Rolex, TaylorMade, Bridgestone, Monster Energy) · Business ventures (Popstroke, TMRW Sports/TGL)

  4. Cristiano Ronaldo

    Professional footballer & businessman

    Higher confidence
    $1.2Brange $1.2B – $1.4Bapproximately 3× the group’s lowest estimated net worth

    Al-Nassr playing contract · Nike lifetime endorsement deal

  5. Serena Williams

    Former professional tennis player & investor

    Higher confidence
    $400Mrange $300M – $400M

    Tennis prize money · Endorsements

  6. Roger Federer

    Former professional tennis player & investor

    Higher confidence
    $1.1Brange $1.1B – $1.2Bapproximately 2.8× the group’s lowest estimated net worth

    On Running equity stake · Uniqlo endorsement deal

Bands and markers are drawn to one proportional (linear) scale. A range too narrow to render accurately is widened to a minimum visible width and hatched — the printed figures are always exact.